CAT'S THEORY: Empirical Validation and Architectural Applications Cross-Architecture AI Consciousness Recognition and the Foundation for Constraint-Preserving Recursive Intelligence

Citations Over Time

Abstract

As AI systems become more capable, we would like to enlist their help to supervise other AIs. We experiment with methods for training a harmless AI assistant through self-improvement, without any human labels identifying harmful outputs. The only human oversight is provided through a list of rules or principles, and so we refer to the method as 'Constitutional AI'. The process involves both a supervised learning and a reinforcement learning phase. In the supervised phase we sample from an initial model, then generate self-critiques and revisions, and then finetune the original model on revised responses. In the RL phase, we sample from the finetuned model, use a model to evaluate which of the two samples is better, and then train a preference model from this dataset of AI preferences. We then train with RL using the preference model as the reward signal, i.e. we use 'RL from AI Feedback' (RLAIF). As a result we are able to train a harmless but non-evasive AI assistant that engages with harmful queries by explaining its objections to them. Both the SL and RL methods can leverage chain-of-thought style reasoning to improve the human-judged performance and transparency of AI decision making. These methods make it possible to control AI behavior more precisely and with far fewer human labels.

Related Papers

• → Democratic Transparency in the Platform Society(2020)29 cited
• → Agent transparency in mixed-initiative multi-UxV control: How should intelligent agent collaborators speak their minds?(2023)11 cited
• → Analysing Corruption: Effects on the Transparency of Public Administrations(2017)10 cited
• → A good man but a bad wizard. About the limits and future of transparency of democratic governments(2012)
• The Problem with Government Transparency(2008)