The Capacity for Moral Self-Correction in Large Language Models

Citations Over Time

Abstract

We test the hypothesis that language models trained with reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF) have the capability to "morally self-correct" -- to avoid producing harmful outputs -- if instructed to do so. We find strong evidence in support of this hypothesis across three different experiments, each of which reveal different facets of moral self-correction. We find that the capability for moral self-correction emerges at 22B model parameters, and typically improves with increasing model size and RLHF training. We believe that at this level of scale, language models obtain two capabilities that they can use for moral self-correction: (1) they can follow instructions and (2) they can learn complex normative concepts of harm like stereotyping, bias, and discrimination. As such, they can follow instructions to avoid certain kinds of morally harmful outputs. We believe our results are cause for cautious optimism regarding the ability to train language models to abide by ethical principles.

Related Papers

• → Is Optimism Always Best?(2006)195 cited
• → Women, information technology and ‘waves of optimism’: Australian evidence on ‘mixed‐skill’ jobs(2007)39 cited
• → Optimism and Planning for Future Care Needs among Older Adults(2014)33 cited
• → The Power of Positivity –Optimism and the 7th Sense Author: Padmakali Banerjee(2018)
• → Failing to Learn from Failure: How Optimism Impedes Entrepreneurial Innovation (WITHDRAWN)(2019)