Two Kinds of Recall

Citations Over Time

Abstract

It is an established assumption that pattern-based models are good at precision, while learning based models are better at recall. But is that really the case? I argue that there are two kinds of recall: d-recall, reflecting diversity, and e-recall, reflecting exhaustiveness. I demonstrate through experiments that while neural methods are indeed significantly better at d-recall, it is sometimes the case that pattern-based methods are still substantially better at e-recall. Ideal methods should aim for both kinds, and this ideal should in turn be reflected in our evaluations.

Related Papers

• A Gendered “Ideal?” Discourses that Characterize the Ideal Scientist(2021)
• → The Bioethics of Second-Best(2012)7 cited
• → Wilde Thoughts on Philosophical Reference in An Ideal Husband: “An Ideal” Versus “The Ideal” Husband(2017)1 cited
• Advocating Ambition Ideal of Ancient China and Its Realistic Values(2007)
• The Educational Ideal of Educators(2004)