Understanding Transformer Reasoning Capabilities via Graph Algorithms
Citations Over Time
Abstract
Which transformer scaling regimes are able to perfectly solve different classes of algorithmic problems? While tremendous empirical advances have been attained by transformer-based neural networks, a theoretical understanding of their algorithmic reasoning capabilities in realistic parameter regimes is lacking. We investigate this question in terms of the network's depth, width, and number of extra tokens for algorithm execution. Our novel representational hierarchy separates 9 algorithmic reasoning problems into classes solvable by transformers in different realistic parameter scaling regimes. We prove that logarithmic depth is necessary and sufficient for tasks like graph connectivity, while single-layer transformers with small embedding dimensions can solve contextual retrieval tasks. We also support our theoretical analysis with ample empirical evidence using the GraphQA benchmark. These results show that transformers excel at many graph reasoning tasks, even outperforming specialized graph neural networks.
Related Papers
- → Remarks on Algorithm 2, Algorithm 3, Algorithm 15, Algorithm 25 and Algorithm 26(1961)2 cited
- → Remarks on Algorithm 332: Jacobi polynomials: Algorithm 344: student's t -distribution: Algorithm 351: modified Romberg quadrature: Algorithm 359: factoral analysis of variance(1970)
- Using DataGrid Control to Realize DataBase of Querying in VB6.0(2000)
- Susquehanna Chorale Spring Concert "Roots and Wings"(2017)
- → ИСПОЛЬЗОВAНИЕ ПОТЕНЦИAЛA СОЦИAЛЬНЫХ ПAРТНЕРОВ В ПОДГОТОВКЕ БУДУЩИХ ПЕДAГОГОВ(2024)