Rising declaratives of the Quality-suspending kind
Citations Over TimeTop 10% of 2018 papers
Abstract
The theory of Intonational Compliance Marking (ICM) maintains that speakers of English use final rising intonation to indicate a suspension (potential violation) of a conversational maxim (Westera 2013; 2014). This paper aims to show that a certain kind of rising declarative, one which has been prominent in the literature (e.g., Gunlogson 2008), can be adequately understood in ICM’s terms as involving a suspension of the maxim of Quality. By explicating certain minimal assumptions about pragmatics, this understanding accounts for three core features of such rising declaratives: their question-likeness, the speaker bias they express and their badness out of the blue. In a nutshell, their question-likeness is derived from principles of general cooperative discourse, their bias from the relative importance of the maxim of Quality, and their badness out of the blue from a competition between rising declaratives and interrogatives. The account is compared in detail to various existing accounts of rising declaratives of the relevant sort, highlighting explanatory and empirical differences.
Related Papers
- → The contrast between interrogatives and questions(1994)185 cited
- → Interrogative–Indefinite Puzzle(2007)2 cited
- → The Interrogative in a Syntactic Framework(1978)9 cited
- The Study of Interrogative Sentences in Lao Ch’i-ta(2013)
- → Polar Interrogative Strategies in Obolo(2022)