Analysis of Rhizosphere Soil Bacterial Communities on Seonginbong, Ulleungdo Island

Citations Over Time

Abstract

본 연구에서는 울릉도 성인봉지역의 근권 토양시료로부터 세균군집의 다양성을 조사하였다. 파이로시퀀싱에 의한 16S rRNA 유전자의 염기서열 분석결과 총 1,613개 OTUs를 확인했다. 세균 군집 조사결과 문 수준에서 Proteobacteria문이 42.29%, Acidobacteria문이 26.30%, 그리고 Actinobacteria문이 6.89%로 전체세균의 81.47%를 차지하였다. 강 수준에서는 α-proteobacteria강이 36.07%로 우점하고 있었으며, Acidobacteria_c강이 10.65% 차 우점하였다. 과 수준에서는 Bradyrhizobiaceae과가 22.83%로 우점하고 있었으며, Acidobacteriaceae과가 10.62%으로차 우점하고 있었다. 울릉도와 독도는 환경적으로 유사하지만 울릉도에서의 식물상이 보다 다양하고 개체수가 훨씬 많기 때문에 우점하고 있는 세균의 비율은 높은 차이를 보였지만 비우점 세균들이 차지하는 비율은 다양하게 나타났다. 울릉도와 독도의 세균군집의 다양성 차이는 환경요인에 의한 영향보다 지리적인 위치와 더 관련이 있으며 또한 식생의 유형에 따라 세균 군집의 다양성 영향을 미치는 것으로 보인다. The study of microbial diversity and richness in soil samples from a volcanic island named Ulleungdo, located east of South Korea. The soil bacterial communities on the Ulleungdo were analyzed using pyrosequencing method based on 16S rRNA gene. There were 1,613 operational taxonomic units (OUT) form soil sample. From results of a BLASTN search against the EzTaxon-e database, the validated reads (obtained after sequence preprocessing) were almost all classified at the phylum level. Proteobacteria was the most dominant phylum with 48.28%, followed by acidobacteria (26.30%), actionbacteria (6.89%), Chloroflexi (4.58), Planctomycetes (4.56%), Nitrospirae (1.83%), Bacteroidetes (1.51%), Verrucomicrobia (1.48%), and Gemmatimonadetes (1.11%). α-proteobacteria was the most dominant class with 36.07% followed by Acidobacteria_c (10.65%), Solibacteres (10.64%), δ-proteobacteria (4.42%), γ-proteobacteria (4.29%), Planctomycetacia (4.16%), Actinobacteria_c (4.00%), Betaproteobacteria (3.50%), EU686603_c (2.97%), Ktedonobacteria (2.91%), Acidimicrobiia (1.32%), Verrucomicrobiae (1.27%), Gemmatimonadetes_c (1.11%), Sphingobacteria (1.09%), and GU444092_c (1.06%). Bradyrhizobiaceae was the most dominant family with 22.83% followed by Acidobacteriaceae (10.62%), EU445199_f (5.72%), Planctomycetaceae (4.03%), Solibacteraceae (3.63%), FM209092_f (3.58%), Steroidobacter_f (2.81%), EU686603_f (2.73%), Hyphomicrobiaceae (2.33%), Ktedonobacteraceae (1.75%), AF498716_f (1.46%), Rhizomicrobium_f (1.03%), and Mycobacteriaceae (1.01%). Differences in the diversity of bacterial communities have more to do with geography than the impact on environmental factors and also the type of vegetation seems to affect the diversity of bacterial communities.

Related Papers

• → Phylogenetic Analysis and In Situ Identification of Bacteria Community Composition in an Acidic Sphagnum Peat Bog(2006)302 cited
• → Uncultured bacterial diversity in tropical maize (Zea mays L.) rhizosphere(2011)33 cited
• Bacterial phylogenetic diversity of a cold spring sediment of Shawan,Xinjiang(2010)
• Bacterioplankton Composition in Huguangyan Maar Lake Revealed by Environmental 16S rDNA and 16S rcDNA Sequence Analysis(2013)
• Spatial distribution of bacterial communities in high-altitude freshwater wetland sediment(2014)