0 citations
Ridge preservation techniques to avoid invasive bone reconstruction: A systematic review and meta-analysis: Naples Consensus Report Working Group C
PubMed2019Vol. 12(4), pp. 399–416
Citations Over TimeTop 10% of 2019 papers
Shayan Barootchi, Hom‐Lay Wang, Andrea Ravidà, Faten Ben Amor, Francesco Riccitiello, Carlo Rengo, Ana I. Sedano Paz, Luigi Laino, Gaetano Marenzi, Roberta Gasparro, Gilberto Sammartino
Abstract
Regardless of the protocol, ARP can only minimise ridge resorption. ARP is most effective on horizontal ridge width, providing the most benefit coronally (approximating the crest), followed by the midbuccal ridge height.
Related Papers
- → A Modified Ridge Splitting Technique Using Autogenous Bone Blocks—A Case Series(2020)26 cited
- → Alveolar ridge reconstruction and/or preservation using root form bioglass cones(1998)69 cited
- → Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography Angle for Predicting the Outcome of Horizontal Bone Augmentation(2013)25 cited
- → Alveolar ridge dimensional changes following ridge preservation procedure usingSocketKAP™: exploratory study of serial cone‐beam computed tomography and histologic analysis in canine model(2015)7 cited
- → Clinical, Histologic and Histomorphometric Evaluation of Bone Strip Allograft with Resorbable Membrane in Horizontal Alveolar Ridge Augmentation: A Preliminary Study(2014)5 cited