Locating and Appraising Systematic Reviews

Citations Over TimeTop 1% of 1997 papers

Abstract

Several methods can be used to identify systematic reviews. These include bibliographic databases, such as MEDLINE, Best Evidence, and the Cochrane Library. In the future, the Cochrane Library could become the source of choice for systematic reviews because it provides the full text for Cochrane reviews and citations to many other systematic reviews. Moreover, the Library is growing rapidly and becoming more readily available, and its searching capabilities are being improved with each update. Although Best Evidence contains fewer systematic reviews than the Cochrane Library, it is specifically designed for practicing internists and primary care physicians and includes systematic reviews on diagnosis, cause, prognosis, and quality improvement. At present, however, MEDLINE and other bibliographic databases are probably the most up-to-date and readily available sources of systematic reviews. Systematic reviews are a powerful and useful way to assemble evidence; however, just because a review has been done using systematic review methods does not guarantee that its results are credible. Regardless of the source, all systematic reviews (like all types of research evidence) require critical appraisal to determine their validity and to establish whether and how they will be useful in practice.

Related Papers

• → The development of a critical appraisal tool for use in systematic reviews addressing questions of prevalence(2014)1,399 cited
• → Critical Appraisal of a Systematic Review: A Concise Review(2022)26 cited
• → Cochrane Skin Group systematic reviews are more methodologically rigorous than other systematic reviews in dermatology(2006)74 cited
• The Development of a Critical Appraisal Tool for Use in Systematic Reviews: Addressing Questions of Prevalence(2014)
• → Critical Appraisal for Systematic Review: Focused on A MeaSurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews 2(2022)