Accuracy of Computed Tomographic Angiography and Magnetic Resonance Angiography for Diagnosing Renal Artery Stenosis
Annals of Internal Medicine2004Vol. 141(9), pp. 674–682
Citations Over TimeTop 1% of 2004 papers
G. Boudewijn C. Vasbinder, Patricia J. Nelemans, Alfons G.H. Kessels, Abraham A. Kroon, Jeffrey H. Maki, Tim Leiner, F. J. A. Beek, Michael B. J. M. Korst, Karin Flobbe, Michiel W. de Haan, Willem H. van Zwam, Cornelis T. Postma, M. G. Myriam Hunink, Peter W. de Leeuw, Jos M. A. van Engelshoven, for the Renal Artery Diagnostic Imaging Study in Hypertension (RADISH) Study Group*
Abstract
Computed tomographic angiography and MRA are not reproducible or sensitive enough to rule out renal artery stenosis in hypertensive patients. Therefore, DSA remains the diagnostic method of choice. *For a list of the other investigators and research coordinators who participated in RADISH, see the Appendix.
Related Papers
- → A case of treatable hypertension: fibromuscular dysplasia of renal arteries(2016)12 cited
- → Computed tomographic angiography versus digital subtraction angiography for the postoperative detection of residual aneurysms: a single-institution series and meta-analysis(2011)24 cited
- → Renal Artery Stenosis Due to Fibromuscular Dysplasia in an 18-Week Pregnant Woman(2005)15 cited
- → Fibromuscular Dysplasia: An Uncommon Cause of Secondary Hypertension(2006)13 cited
- Comparative Study of 3D-CTA,2D-DSA and 3D-DSA in the Diagnosis of Intracranial Aneurysms(2011)