Efficacy of Platelet-Rich Plasma in Reduction of Post-Operative Split-Thickness Skin Graft Loss and Hematoma Formation: A Meta-Analysis

Citations Over TimeTop 18% of 2021 papers

Abstract

Split-thickness skin grafting is a very popular technique of wound closure, especially for large wounds. The success rate of a split-thickness skin graft (STSG) has consistently been in the range of 70-90%. Multiple techniques have been introduced to further improve graft survival, for example, the use of autologous platelet-rich plasma (PRP), thrombin gel, platelet-rich fibrin matrix, and negative pressure wound therapy. We evaluated the impact of PRP use on the survival of STSG through a meta-analysis. We conducted the analysis in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) protocol and performed a literature search using the following databases: PubMed, Cochrane, and ClinicalTrials.gov. A total of 126 articles were yielded by the search, out of which four randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were included according to our eligibility criteria and irrelevant articles were excluded. The intervention group received PRP application to the wound bed before applying the graft while the control group received treatment with conventional fixation procedures (sutures and staples). We estimated the pooled odds ratio with a 95% confidence interval (CI). The total number of participants in the analysis was 460. The participants had wounds of varying etiology. Post-operative graft loss and hematoma formation were taken to be the primary and secondary outcome measures, respectively. Thirty-four participants suffered graft loss of differing extent in the control group while three participants suffered graft loss in the intervention group. The pooled odds ratio for graft loss was 0.15 (95% CI: 0.05-0.49; I2=38%; p=0.184) signifying that PRP use decreased the odds of graft loss by 85%. For our secondary outcome measure, 440 participants were studied. Forty-four participants suffered hematoma formation in the control group versus 11 in the intervention group. The pooled odds ratio for hematoma formation was calculated as 0.21 (95% CI: 0.09-0.50; I2=0%; p=0.869) signifying that PRP use decreased the odds of hematoma formation by 79%. PRP appears to significantly impact graft survival, and further studies are needed to strengthen the evidence base for its use in split-thickness skin grafting.

Related Papers

• → Platelet-Rich Plasma Injection Is More Effective than Hyaluronic Acid in the Treatment of Knee Osteoarthritis(2013)91 cited
• → Comparison of the Efficacy of Homologous and Autologous Platelet-Rich Plasma (PRP) for Treating Androgenic Alopecia(2017)41 cited
• → Platelet-rich plasma is similar to platelet-rich plasma plus hyaluronic acid for the treatment of knee osteoarthritis at 2 years: a randomized controlled trial(2023)16 cited
• → Treatment of knee osteoarthritis with platelet-rich plasma in comparison with platelet-rich plasma plus hyaluronic acid: a short-term double-blind randomized clinical study(2018)3 cited
• → Function ex vivo of 111 In‐Labelled Human Platelets Simultaneous Aggregation of Labelled and Unlabelled Platelets Induced by Collagen(1982)5 cited