Systematic review of patient-reported outcome measures in patients with varicose veins
British journal of surgery2017Vol. 104(11), pp. 1424–1432
Citations Over TimeTop 12% of 2017 papers
Ahmed Aber, Edith Poku, Patrick Phillips, Munira Essat, Helen Buckley Woods, Simon Palfreyman, Eva Kaltenthaler, Georgina Jones, Jonathan Michaels
Abstract
There is a scarcity of psychometric evidence for PROMs used in patients with varicose veins. These data suggest that AVVQ and SF-36® are the most rigorously evaluated PROMs in patients with varicose veins.
Related Papers
- → The internal consistency reliability and construct validity of the Francis scale of attitude toward Christianity (adult) among undergraduate students in the U.K., U.S.A., Australia and Canada(1995)124 cited
- → Systematic review of patient-reported outcome measures in patients with varicose veins(2017)27 cited
- → Reliability and Construct Validity for Scale of Rejection of Christianity(2003)4 cited
- → RELIABILITY AND CONSTRUCT VALIDITY FOR SCALE OF REJECTION OF CHRISTIANITY(2003)1 cited
- Construct validity and internal consistency of three factor structures and two scoring methods of the 12-item General Health Questionnaire(2017)