Undisputed norms and normal errors in human thinking
Behavioral and Brain Sciences2011Vol. 34(5), pp. 255–256
Citations Over Time
Abstract
Abstract This commentary questions Elqayam & Evans' (E&E's) claims that thinking tasks are doomed to have multiple normative readings and that only applied research allows normative evaluations. In fact, some tasks have just one undisputed normative reading, and not only pathological gamblers but also normal individuals sometimes need normative guidance. To conclude, normative evaluations are inevitable in the investigation of human thinking.
Related Papers
- → Three Cheers for Dispositions: A Dispositional Approach to Acting for a Normative Reason(2016)45 cited
- → Undisputed norms and normal errors in human thinking(2011)5 cited
- Susquehanna Chorale Spring Concert "Roots and Wings"(2017)
- → DETERMINING QUALITY REQUIREMENTS AT THE UNIVERSITIES TO IMPROVE THE QUALITY OF EDUCATION(2018)