Novel Isobaric Tagging Reagent Enabled Multiplex Quantitative Glycoproteomics via Electron-Transfer/Higher-Energy Collisional Dissociation (EThcD) Mass Spectrometry

Citations Over Time

Abstract

Protein glycosylation, covalent attachment of carbohydrates to polypeptide chains, is a highly important post-translational modification involved in many essential physiological processes. Comprehensive site-specific and quantitative analysis is crucial for revealing the diverse functions and dynamics of glycosylation. To characterize intact glycopeptides, mass spectrometry (MS)-based glycoproteomics employs versatile fragmentation methods, among which electron-transfer/higher-energy collision dissociation (EThcD) has gained great popularity. However, the inherent limitation of EThcD in fragmenting low-charge ions has prevented its widespread applications. Furthermore, there is a need to develop a high-throughput strategy for comparative glycoproteomics with a large cohort of samples. Herein, we developed isobaric N,N-dimethyl leucine-derivatized ethylenediamine (DiLeuEN) tags to increase the charge states of glycopeptides, thereby improving the fragmentation efficiency and allowing for in-depth intact glycopeptide analysis, especially for sialoglycopeptides. Moreover, the unique reporter ions of DiLeuEN-labeled glycopeptides generated in tandem MS spectra enable relative quantification of up to four samples in a single analysis, which represents a new high-throughput method for quantitative glycoproteomics.

Related Papers

• → Optimal Dissociation Methods Differ for N - and O -Glycopeptides(2020)226 cited
• → The benefits of hybrid fragmentation methods for glycoproteomics(2018)132 cited
• → Simply Extending the Mass Range in Electron Transfer Higher Energy Collisional Dissociation Increases Confidence in N-Glycopeptide Identification(2019)54 cited
• → Novel Isobaric Tagging Reagent Enabled Multiplex Quantitative Glycoproteomics via Electron-Transfer/Higher-Energy Collisional Dissociation (EThcD) Mass Spectrometry(2022)10 cited
• → Optimal Dissociation Methods Differ for N- and O-glycopeptides(2020)4 cited