Validity and Limitations of the Bridged Annulene Model for Porphyrins
Citations Over TimeTop 10% of 2012 papers
Abstract
According to the bridged annulene model, macrocyclic aromaticity of a porphyrinoid species can be attributed to the annulene-like main macrocyclic conjugation pathway (MMCP). Macrocyclic aromaticity, however, is given theoretically as a sum of contributions from all macrocyclic circuits. We found that the aromaticity due to each macrocyclic circuit is determined formally but broadly by Hückel's [4n + 2] rule of aromaticity. Nitrogen atoms in the pyrrolic rings effectively suppress the variation in the number of π electrons staying along each macrocyclic circuit. As a result, all or most macrocyclic circuits in oligopyrrolic macrocycles are made aromatic (or antiaromaitc) in phase with the MMCP. Thus, the MMCP is not a determinant of macrocyclic aromaticity but can be regarded as a good indicator of this quantity. This is why the bridged annulene model appears to hold for many porphyrins.
Related Papers
- → Validity and Limitations of the Bridged Annulene Model for Porphyrins(2012)75 cited
- → The origin of global and macrocyclic aromaticity in porphyrinoids(2012)34 cited
- → A study on the aromatic conjugation pathways and the ring currents of bridged [18]annulenes(2019)8 cited
- → A theoretical—information study on the electron delocalization (aromaticity) of annulenes with and without bond alternation(1982)9 cited
- → A theoretical scheme of annulenes aromaticity(1984)3 cited