Transparency and reproducibility in artificial intelligence
Nature2020Vol. 586(7829), pp. E14–E16
Citations Over TimeTop 1% of 2020 papers
Benjamin Haibe‐Kains, George Alexandru Adam, Ahmed Hosny, Farnoosh Khodakarami, Massive Analysis Quality Control (MAQC) Society Board of Directors, Thakkar Shraddha, Rebecca Kusko, Susanna‐Assunta Sansone, Weida Tong, Russ Wolfinger, Christopher E. Mason, Wendell Jones, Joaquı́n Dopazo, Cesare Furlanello, Levi Waldron, Bo Wang, Chris McIntosh, Anna Goldenberg, Anshul Kundaje, Casey S. Greene, Tamara Broderick, Michael M. Hoffman, Jeffrey T. Leek, Keegan Korthauer, Wolfgang Huber, Alvis Brāzma, Joëlle Pineau, Robert Tibshirani, Trevor Hastie, John P. A. Ioannidis, John Quackenbush, Hugo J.W.L. Aerts
Abstract
Breakthroughs in artificial intelligence (AI) hold enormous potential as it can automate complex tasks and go even beyond human performance. In their study, McKinney et al. showed the high potential of AI for breast cancer screening. However, the lack of methods’ details and algorithm code undermines its scientific value. Here, we identify obstacles hindering transparent and reproducible AI research as faced by McKinney et al., and provide solutions to these obstacles with implications for the broader field.
Related Papers
- → Democratic Transparency in the Platform Society(2020)29 cited
- Susquehanna Chorale Spring Concert "Roots and Wings"(2017)
- → DETERMINING QUALITY REQUIREMENTS AT THE UNIVERSITIES TO IMPROVE THE QUALITY OF EDUCATION(2018)
- The Problem with Government Transparency(2008)
- → ИСПОЛЬЗОВAНИЕ ПОТЕНЦИAЛA СОЦИAЛЬНЫХ ПAРТНЕРОВ В ПОДГОТОВКЕ БУДУЩИХ ПЕДAГОГОВ(2024)