Lying and Deception in Games
Journal of Political Economy2019Vol. 128(3), pp. 907–947
Citations Over TimeTop 10% of 2019 papers
Abstract
This article proposes definitions of lying, deception, and damage in strategic settings. Lying depends on the existence of accepted meanings for messages but does not require a model of how the audience responds to messages. Deception does require a model of how the audience interprets messages but does not directly refer to consequences. Damage requires consideration of the consequences of messages. Lies need not be deceptive. Deception does not require lying. Lying and deception are compatible with equilibrium. I give conditions under which deception must be damaging.
Related Papers
- → Lying and Deception in Games(2019)83 cited
- → Guidelines to catch a liar(2004)40 cited
- → On deception and lying: An overview of over 100 years of social science research(2022)16 cited
- Susquehanna Chorale Spring Concert "Roots and Wings"(2017)
- → DETERMINING QUALITY REQUIREMENTS AT THE UNIVERSITIES TO IMPROVE THE QUALITY OF EDUCATION(2018)