Target Validity and the Hierarchy of Study Designs

Citations Over TimeTop 1% of 2018 papers

Abstract

In recent years, increasing attention has been paid to problems of external validity, specifically to methodological approaches for both quantitative generalizability and transportability of study results. However, most approaches to these issues have considered external validity separately from internal validity. Here we argue that considering either internal or external validity in isolation may be problematic. Further, we argue that a joint measure of the validity of an effect estimate with respect to a specific population of interest may be more useful: We call this proposed measure target validity. In this work, we introduce and formally define target bias as the total difference between the true causal effect in the target population and the estimated causal effect in the study sample, and target validity as target bias = 0. We illustrate this measure with a series of examples and show how this measure may help us to think more clearly about comparisons between experimental and nonexperimental research results. Specifically, we show that even perfect internal validity does not ensure that a causal effect will be unbiased in a specific target population.

Related Papers

• → Internal, External, and Ecological Validity in Research Design, Conduct, and Evaluation(2018)305 cited
• → Concern Over Internal, External, and Incidence Validity in Studies of Child-Care Quantity and Externalizing Behavior Problems(2017)33 cited
• → Validity in Evaluation Research: a critical assessment of current issues(1988)15 cited
• → Study validity(2018)5 cited
• → Measurement Validity(2021)