Internal, External, and Ecological Validity in Research Design, Conduct, and Evaluation
Citations Over TimeTop 1% of 2018 papers
Abstract
Reliability and validity describe desirable psychometric characteristics of research instruments. The concept of validity is also applied to research studies and their findings. Internal validity examines whether the study design, conduct, and analysis answer the research questions without bias. External validity examines whether the study findings can be generalized to other contexts. Ecological validity examines, specifically, whether the study findings can be generalized to real-life settings; thus ecological validity is a subtype of external validity. These concepts are explained using examples so that readers may understand why the consideration of internal, external, and ecological validity is important for designing and conducting studies, and for understanding the merits of published research.
Related Papers
- → Internal, External, and Ecological Validity in Research Design, Conduct, and Evaluation(2018)305 cited
- → Representative and Quasi-Representative Designs for Research on Teaching(1974)205 cited
- → Study validity(2018)5 cited
- → Validity in psychological research The interpretation of causes in experiments; Sources of variance in the experiment; Validity in experiments and other research designs; Types of validity (Statistical conclusion validity, Internal validity, Construct validity); Tackling confounds in psychological research; Expectancy; External validity; Meta-analysis(2017)
- → External Validity(2021)