Bias in Calculation of Attributable Fractions Using Relative Risks from Nonsmokers Only
Citations Over TimeTop 20% of 2014 papers
Abstract
Studies of weight and mortality sometimes state that the mortality relative risks for obesity from nonsmokers are valid estimates of the relative risks for obesity in both smokers and nonsmokers. Extending this idea, several influential articles have used relative risks for obesity from nonsmokers and attributable fraction methods for unadjusted risks to estimate attributable fractions of deaths in the entire population (smokers and nonsmokers combined). However, stratification by smoking is a form of adjustment for confounding. Simplified examples show that the use of relative risks from only 1 stratum to estimate attributable fractions, without incorporating data on the stratification variable, gives incorrect results for the entire population. Even if the mortality relative risks for obesity from nonsmokers are indeed valid in both smokers and nonsmokers, these relative risks nonetheless need to be treated as adjusted relative risks for the purpose of calculating attributable fractions for the whole sample.
Related Papers
- → Bias in Calculation of Attributable Fractions Using Relative Risks from Nonsmokers Only(2014)32 cited
- → Confounding and Bias in the Attributable Fraction(2010)95 cited
- → Obesity and its comorbidities: present and future importance on health status in Switzerland(2005)14 cited
- Use of Kloeden et al's relative risk curves and confidence limits to estimate crashes attributable to low and high level speeding(2013)
- → Estimation of Attributable Risk in the Presence of Confounding(1979)23 cited