A PRISMA assessment of the reporting quality of systematic reviews of nursing published in the Cochrane Library and paper-based journals
Medicine2019Vol. 98(49), pp. e18099–e18099
Citations Over TimeTop 12% of 2019 papers
Abstract
Nursing researchers who participate in SRs should follow the latest Cochrane Handbook to prepare such study. Meanwhile, the PRISMA statement should be followed strictly to report SRs, so as to improve the quality of SRs.
Related Papers
- → Locating and Appraising Systematic Reviews(1997)160 cited
- → Cochrane Skin Group systematic reviews are more methodologically rigorous than other systematic reviews in dermatology(2006)74 cited
- → Comparison of search strategies in systematic reviews of adverse effects to other systematic reviews(2014)56 cited
- → Lessons for search strategies from a systematic review, in The Cochrane Library , of nutritional supplementation trials in patients after hip fracture(2001)87 cited
- → Systematic review and modelling of the cost-effectiveness of cardiac magnetic resonance imaging compared with current existing testing pathways in ischaemic cardiomyopathy(2014)26 cited