Direct-fit to nature: an evolutionary perspective on biological (and artificial) neural networks

Citations Over Time

Abstract

Abstract Evolution is a blind fitting process by which organisms, over generations, adapt to the niches of an ever-changing environment. Does the mammalian brain use similar brute-force fitting processes to learn how to perceive and act upon the world? Recent advances in training deep neural networks has exposed the power of optimizing millions of synaptic weights to map millions of observations along ecologically relevant objective functions. This class of models has dramatically outstripped simpler, more intuitive models, operating robustly in real-life contexts spanning perception, language, and action coordination. These models do not learn an explicit, human-interpretable representation of the underlying structure of the data; rather, they use local computations to interpolate over task-relevant manifolds in a high-dimensional parameter space. Furthermore, counterintuitively, over-parameterized models, similarly to evolutionary processes, can be simple and parsimonious as they provide a versatile, robust solution for learning a diverse set of functions. In contrast to traditional scientific models, where the ultimate goal is interpretability, over-parameterized models eschew interpretability in favor of solving real-life problems or tasks. We contend that over-parameterized blind fitting presents a radical challenge to many of the underlying assumptions and practices in computational neuroscience and cognitive psychology. At the same time, this shift in perspective informs longstanding debates and establishes unexpected links with evolution, ecological psychology, and artificial life.

Related Papers

• → ML interpretability: Simple isn't easy(2024)29 cited
• → When consumers need more interpretability of artificial intelligence (AI) recommendations? The effect of decision-making domains(2023)7 cited
• → Measures of Model Interpretability for Model Selection(2018)10 cited
• → Measuring Interpretability for Different Types of Machine Learning Models(2018)15 cited
• → ML Interpretability: Simple Isn't Easy(2022)2 cited