Performance Comparison of Three Types of Autoencoder Neural Networks
2008pp. 213–218
Citations Over TimeTop 19% of 2008 papers
Abstract
This paper presents a comparison performance on three types of autoencoders, namely, the traditional autoencoder with Restricted Boltzmann Machine (RBM), the stacked autoencoder without RBM and the stacked autoencoder with RBM. The performances are compared based on the reconstruction error for face images and using the same values for the parameters such as the number of neurons in the hidden layers, the training method, and the learning rate. The results show that the RBM stacked autoencoder gives better performance in terms of the reconstruction error compared to the other two architectures.
Related Papers
- → Performance Comparison of Three Types of Autoencoder Neural Networks(2008)28 cited
- → Reconstruction of handwritten digit images using autoencoder neural networks(2008)18 cited
- → Simultaneous Cell Detection and Classification with an Asymmetric Deep Autoencoder in Bone Marrow Histology Images(2017)8 cited
- → A Novel Harris Hawk Algorithm (HHA) to Optimize Deep Autoencoder (DAE) Method of Deep Learning for Cancer Diagnosis(2023)2 cited
- → A deep learning approach for stock market prediction using deep autoencoder and long short-term memory(2021)1 cited