Medical marijuana laws and adolescent marijuana use in the United States: a systematic review and meta‐analysis
Addiction2018Vol. 113(6), pp. 1003–1016
Citations Over TimeTop 1% of 2018 papers
Aaron L. Sarvet, Melanie M. Wall, David S. Fink, Emily Greene, Aline Le, Anne E. Boustead, Rosalie Liccardo Pacula, Katherine M. Keyes, Magdalena Cerdá, Sandro Galea, Deborah S. Hasin
Abstract
Synthesis of the current evidence does not support the hypothesis that US medical marijuana laws (MMLs) until 2014 have led to increases in adolescent marijuana use prevalence. Limited heterogeneity exists among estimates of effects of MMLs on other patterns of marijuana use, of effects within particular population subgroups and of effects of specific MML provisions.
Related Papers
- → Power analysis for random‐effects meta‐analysis(2017)595 cited
- → Locating and Appraising Systematic Reviews(1997)160 cited
- → Systematic reviews are rarely used to contextualise new results—a systematic review and meta-analysis of meta-research studies(2022)19 cited
- → Do pooled estimates from orthodontic meta-analyses change depending on the meta-analysis approach? A meta-epidemiological study(2023)4 cited
- → Meta‐Analysis of Sleep Duration and Obesity in Children: Fixed Effect Model or Random Effect Model?(2017)3 cited