A new framework for the documentation and interpretation of oral food challenges in population-based and clinical research
Allergy2016Vol. 72(3), pp. 453–461
Citations Over TimeTop 10% of 2016 papers
Linus Grabenhenrich, Andreas Reich, Johanna Bellach, Valérie Trendelenburg, A. B. Sprikkelman, Graham Roberts, Kate Grimshaw, Sigurveig Sigurdardottir, Marek L. Kowalski, Nikolaos G. Papadopoulos, Santiago Quirce, R. Dubakiene, B. Niggemann, Montserrat Fernández‐Rivas, Barbara Ballmer‐Weber, Ronald van Ree, Sabine Schnadt, E. N. Clare Mills, Thomas Keil, Kirsten Beyer
Abstract
The proposed toolbox sets a standard for improved documentation and harmonized interpretation of DBPCFCs. By a detailed documentation and common terminology for communicating outcomes, these tools hope to reduce the influence of subjective judgment of supervising physicians. All forms are publicly available for further evolution and free use in clinical and research settings.
Related Papers
- → ‘Take Ten’ improving the surgical post-take ward round: a quality improvement project(2018)14 cited
- → TP9.2.27A closed loop audit looking at the use of a checklist in surgical ward rounds to improve ward round documentation. Can we improve patient safety?(2021)1 cited
- → 105 K West Cask Transportation Facility Modification Acceptance for Beneficial Use Checklist Project A.5 and A.6(2000)
- → Auditors' memory for documented evidence(2004)
- → DETERMINING QUALITY REQUIREMENTS AT THE UNIVERSITIES TO IMPROVE THE QUALITY OF EDUCATION(2018)