NOT ALL FAILURES ARE ALIKE: SELF ATTRIBUTION AND PERCEPTION OF TEACHERS‘ ATTRIBUTIONS FOR FAILING TESTS IN LIKED VERSUS DISLIKED SUBJECTS

Abstract

S ummary . Ninth grade students made attributions for failing tests in liked versus disliked school subjects and indicated the attributions their teachers would make for their failure outcomes. Students employed, and expected that their teachers would employ, different patterns of causal attribution to explain their failure in liked versus disliked subjects, with the former yielding more test‐specific attributions. Differences were found between students' attributions and the attributions they expected their teachers to make for the same failure outcomes. The data provide evidence for the important role of ego‐involvement, as indexed by liking of school subjects, in the causal attribution process.

Related Papers

• → Manipulating Attributions for Profit: A Field Test of the Effects of Attributions on Behavior(1985)19 cited
• → NOT ALL FAILURES ARE ALIKE: SELF ATTRIBUTION AND PERCEPTION OF TEACHERS‘ ATTRIBUTIONS FOR FAILING TESTS IN LIKED VERSUS DISLIKED SUBJECTS(1987)3 cited
• → Nurses' Evaluations of Patient Attributions for the Cause and Future of Their Illness1(1990)2 cited
• → The effects of observers' brief task performance and their point of view on their causal attribution for actor's performance.(1984)1 cited
• A Study on Attribution to Learning Success or Failure of English Majors(2013)