Nasal bi‐level positive airway pressure (BiPAP) versus nasal continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) in preterm infants ≤32 weeks: A retrospective cohort study
Journal of Paediatrics and Child Health2016Vol. 52(5), pp. 493–498
Citations Over TimeTop 13% of 2016 papers
Abstract
In this retrospective cohort study, we found BiPAP, compared with CPAP, reduced the need for intubation within the first 72 h of age.
Related Papers
- → Nasal bi‐level positive airway pressure (BiPAP) versus nasal continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) in preterm infants ≤32 weeks: A retrospective cohort study(2016)35 cited
- → Does nasal CPAP reduce bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD)?(2008)25 cited
- → Correlations between oxygen and positive pressure exposure in the neonatal intensive care unit and wheezing in preterm infants without bronchopulmonary dysplasia(2019)1 cited
- → Is It Time for More Than One Constant Positive Airway Pressure?(2002)
- → Is It Time for More Than One Constant Positive Airway Pressure?(2002)