Risk of injury for bicycling on cycle tracks versus in the street

Citations Over TimeTop 1% of 2011 papers

Abstract

Most individuals prefer bicycling separated from motor traffic. However, cycle tracks (physically separated bicycle-exclusive paths along roads, as found in The Netherlands) are discouraged in the USA by engineering guidance that suggests that facilities such as cycle tracks are more dangerous than the street. The objective of this study conducted in Montreal (with a longstanding network of cycle tracks) was to compare bicyclist injury rates on cycle tracks versus in the street. For six cycle tracks and comparable reference streets, vehicle/bicycle crashes and health record injury counts were obtained and use counts conducted. The relative risk (RR) of injury on cycle tracks, compared with reference streets, was determined. Overall, 2.5 times as many cyclists rode on cycle tracks compared with reference streets and there were 8.5 injuries and 10.5 crashes per million bicycle-kilometres. The RR of injury on cycle tracks was 0.72 (95% CI 0.60 to 0.85) compared with bicycling in reference streets. These data suggest that the injury risk of bicycling on cycle tracks is less than bicycling in streets. The construction of cycle tracks should not be discouraged.

Related Papers

• → Linking drinking to injury – causal attribution of injury to alcohol intake among patients in a Swedish emergency room(2007)15 cited
• → Water safety and drowning prevention(2013)7 cited
• → Does improving poison prevention practices reduce childhood poisoning rates(2016)6 cited
• → The role of the ministry of health in preventing injuries and violence(2007)2 cited
• Childhood injury prevention in Israel(2000)