Which Eye Tracker Is Right for Your Research? Performance Evaluation of Several Cost Variant Eye Trackers
Citations Over TimeTop 10% of 2016 papers
Abstract
Though not often mentioned, the price point of many eye tracking systems may be a factor limiting their adoption in research. Recently, several inexpensive eye trackers have appeared on the market, but to date little systematic research has been conducted to validate these systems. The present experiment attempted to address this gap by evaluating and comparing five different eye trackers, the Eye Tribe Tracker, Tobii EyeX, Seeing Machines faceLAB, Smart Eye Pro, and Smart Eye Aurora for their gaze tracking accuracy and precision. Results suggest that all evaluated trackers maintained acceptable accuracy and precision, but lower cost systems frequently also experienced high rates of data loss, suggesting that researchers adopting low cost systems such as those evaluated here should be judicious in their research usage.
Related Papers
- → Which Eye Tracker Is Right for Your Research? Performance Evaluation of Several Cost Variant Eye Trackers(2016)84 cited
- → Introduction to Eye Tracking(2014)39 cited
- → Coalitional tracking(2006)49 cited
- → Basics of Camera-Based Gaze Tracking(2012)11 cited
- → Dhrushti-AI: A multi-screen multi-user eye-tracking system to understand the cognitive behavior of humans in process industries(2023)2 cited