Qualifying counterfactuals: Students' use of counterfactuals for evaluating historical explanations

Citations Over TimeTop 15% of 2020 papers

Abstract

The study investigates upper secondary school students' use of counterfactual reasoning when engaging in a task concerning historical explanation. The study analyses student answers to a prompt asking them to evaluate the causal importance of a historical actor for a historical event, aiming to characterize the counterfactuals used, as well as applying possible criteria for what can be considered a qualified counterfactual. The criteria for qualification of counterfactuals are based on theoretical proposals about the potential of counterfactuals in relation to historical explanation. The findings indicate that a majority of the students involved use counterfactuals in their reasoning about explanatory importance, most of them employing counterfactual reasoning in relation to the historical actor. The analysis of qualification indicates that student reasoning becomes more qualified when students instead focus on structural factors, include both structures and actors in their counterfactual reasoning, or support their reasoning by making comparisons.

Related Papers

• → Psychological Studies of Causal and Counterfactual Reasoning(2011)39 cited
• → Children’s causal reasoning: Counterfactual thinking occurs for ‘negative’ outcomes only(1999)65 cited
• → Counterfactual thought in reasoning and performance(2018)30 cited
• → Qualifying counterfactuals: Students' use of counterfactuals for evaluating historical explanations(2020)4 cited
• → What we imagine versus how we imagine, and a problem for explaining counterfactual thoughts with causal ones(2007)2 cited