Predicting Participant Compliance With Fitness Tracker Wearing and Ecological Momentary Assessment Protocols in Information Workers: Observational Study
JMIR mhealth and uhealth2021Vol. 9(11), pp. e22218–e22218
Citations Over TimeTop 10% of 2021 papers
Gonzalo J. Martinez, Stephen M. Mattingly, Pablo Robles-Granda, Koustuv Saha, Anusha Sirigiri, Jessica L Young, Nitesh V. Chawla, Munmun De Choudhury, Sidney K. D’Mello, Gloria Mark, Aaron Striegel
Abstract
We recommend conducting an initial 2-week pilot to measure trait-like compliance and identify participants at risk of long-term noncompliance, performing oversampling based on participants' individual characteristics to avoid introducing bias in the sample when excluding data based on noncompliance, using an issue tracking portal, and providing special care in troubleshooting to help participants maintain compliance.
Related Papers
- → The Acceptability, Feasibility, and Effectiveness of Wearable Activity Trackers for Increasing Physical Activity in Children and Adolescents: A Systematic Review(2021)90 cited
- → Exploring Families’ Acceptance of Wearable Activity Trackers: A Mixed-Methods Study(2022)22 cited
- → A Survey of the Development of Wearable Devices(2020)18 cited
- → Commentary: Is Wearable Fitness Technology a Medically Approved Device? Yes and No(2023)14 cited
- → One Step Forward, Two Steps Back: The Key to Wearables in the Field is the App(2015)7 cited