Attributed Question Answering: Evaluation and Modeling for Attributed Large Language Models
Citations Over Time
Abstract
Large language models (LLMs) have shown impressive results while requiring little or no direct supervision. Further, there is mounting evidence that LLMs may have potential in information-seeking scenarios. We believe the ability of an LLM to attribute the text that it generates is likely to be crucial in this setting. We formulate and study Attributed QA as a key first step in the development of attributed LLMs. We propose a reproducible evaluation framework for the task and benchmark a broad set of architectures. We take human annotations as a gold standard and show that a correlated automatic metric is suitable for development. Our experimental work gives concrete answers to two key questions (How to measure attribution?, and How well do current state-of-the-art methods perform on attribution?), and give some hints as to how to address a third (How to build LLMs with attribution?).
Related Papers
- → Manipulating Attributions for Profit: A Field Test of the Effects of Attributions on Behavior(1985)19 cited
- → Issues in Benchmark Metric Selection(2009)13 cited
- → NOT ALL FAILURES ARE ALIKE: SELF ATTRIBUTION AND PERCEPTION OF TEACHERS‘ ATTRIBUTIONS FOR FAILING TESTS IN LIKED VERSUS DISLIKED SUBJECTS(1987)3 cited
- A Study on Attribution to Learning Success or Failure of English Majors(2013)
- Theoretical Analysis of the Benchmark for Choosing Manipulative Instruments of Monetary Policies(2009)