What data do we need for training an AV motion planner?

2021pp. 1066–1072

Citations Over TimeTop 20% of 2021 papers

Long Chen, Lukas Platinsky, Stefanie Speichert, Błażej Osiński, Oliver Scheel, Yawei Ye, Hugo Grimmett, Luca Del Pero, Peter Ondrúška

Abstract

We investigate what grade of sensor data is required for training an imitation-learning-based AV planner on human expert demonstration. Machine-learned planners [1] are very hungry for training data, which is usually collected using vehicles equipped with the same sensors used for autonomous operation [1]. This is costly and non-scalable. If cheaper sensors could be used for collection instead, data availability would go up, which is crucial in a field where data volume requirements are large and availability is small. We present experiments using up to 1000 hours worth of expert demonstration and find that training with 10x lower-quality data outperforms 1x AV-grade data in terms of planner performance (see Fig. 1). The important implication of this is that cheaper sensors can indeed be used. This serves to improve data access and democratize the field of imitation-based motion planning. Alongside this, we perform a sensitivity analysis of planner performance as a function of perception range, field-of-view, accuracy, and data volume, and reason about why lower-quality data still provide good planning results.

Citations Over TimeTop 20% of 2021 papers

Abstract

Related Papers