My circumstances, their circumstances: An actor‐observer distinction in the consequences of external attributions

Citations Over TimeTop 10% of 2024 papers

Abstract

Abstract People may attribute social phenomena to either internal causes (e.g., people's ability, intelligence, effort, or personality) or external causes (e.g., people's circumstances, access to opportunities, treatment by others). In this review, we focus on external attributions, which have been widely characterized as positive because they help people view marginalized groups and rejected individuals sympathetically. We argue, however, that there exists an important actor‐observer distinction in the consequences of external attributions, giving them the potential to yield both positive and negative consequences: When observers attribute others' setbacks or rejections to external causes, this may help them adopt a sympathetic view. However, when actors attribute their own setbacks or rejections to external causes, this view may harm their mental wellbeing, motivation, or self‐concept. We identify this actor‐observer distinction in three domains: social disparities, social rejection, and academic setbacks. Finally, we discuss some implications of this actor‐observer difference and directions for future research.

Related Papers

• → Manipulating Attributions for Profit: A Field Test of the Effects of Attributions on Behavior(1985)19 cited
• → NOT ALL FAILURES ARE ALIKE: SELF ATTRIBUTION AND PERCEPTION OF TEACHERS‘ ATTRIBUTIONS FOR FAILING TESTS IN LIKED VERSUS DISLIKED SUBJECTS(1987)3 cited
• A Study on Attribution to Learning Success or Failure of English Majors(2013)
• Susquehanna Chorale Spring Concert "Roots and Wings"(2017)
• → ИСПОЛЬЗОВAНИЕ ПОТЕНЦИAЛA СОЦИAЛЬНЫХ ПAРТНЕРОВ В ПОДГОТОВКЕ БУДУЩИХ ПЕДAГОГОВ(2024)