Just Say No: Analyzing the Stance of Neural Dialogue Generation in Offensive Contexts | doi.page

0 citations0 references

Just Say No: Analyzing the Stance of Neural Dialogue Generation in Offensive Contexts

Proceedings of the 2021 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing2021

Citations Over TimeTop 10% of 2021 papers

Ashutosh Baheti, Maarten Sap, Alan Ritter, Mark Riedl

Abstract

Dialogue models trained on human conversations inadvertently learn to generate toxic responses. In addition to producing explicitly offensive utterances, these models can also implicitly insult a group or individual by aligning themselves with an offensive statement. To better understand the dynamics of contextually offensive language, we investigate the stance of dialogue model responses in offensive Reddit conversations. Specifically, we create TOXICHAT, a crowd-annotated dataset of 2,000 Reddit threads and model responses labeled with offensive language and stance. Our analysis reveals that 42% of human responses agree with toxic comments, whereas only 13% agree with safe comments. This undesirable behavior is learned by neural dialogue models, such as DialoGPT, which we show are two times more likely to agree with offensive comments. To enable automatic detection of offensive language, we fine-tuned transformerbased classifiers on TOXICHAT that achieve 0.71 F 1 for offensive labels and 0.53 Macro-F 1 for stance labels. Finally, we quantify the effectiveness of controllable text generation (CTG) methods to mitigate the tendency of neural dialogue models to agree with offensive comments. Compared to the baseline, our best CTG model achieves a 19% reduction in agreement with offensive comments and produces 29% fewer offensive replies. Our work highlights the need for further efforts to characterize and analyze inappropriate behavior in dialogue models, in order to help make them safer. 1

Citations Over TimeTop 10% of 2021 papers

Abstract

Related Papers